December 7, 2006

The enemy is a false ideology.

Ultimately ideology is the battle ground where the final battle must be won because it cannot be bombed into oblivion.  However, ideology is coming more and more to the forefront.  This is good.  How to win an ideological conflict? This is the question?
December 7, 1946

Five years after Pearl Harbor, the war was over. The Third Reich was kaput. The Japanese were vanquished as well.

But five years and counting after 9/11, there is no victory in sight. There is not even much clarity about why we are fighting, or whom we are fighting. Some of the most important victories in this shadowy twilight war have come in the form of arrests of those who were plotting attacks even more heinous than 9/11, but these arrests have an unfortunate side effect: they perpetuate the illusion that we are not seriously threatened, that there is nothing to be particularly concerned about -- after all, they haven't struck since 9/11. They probably can't. They probably just got lucky on that day.

One main reason, meanwhile, why the war is so poorly understood and controversial: the enemy is not a nation-state but an ideology, an ideology which has been spread throughout the world and can now be found in practically every nation on the planet. Because of the religious derivation of this ideology, analysts are generally reluctant to identify it properly or fully.

  • They don't wish to examine how this ideology is advancing through peaceful means.
  • They refuse to consider the ways in which it threatens American society, laws, and mores.
  • And multiculturalism dins into all our ears that all value systems and belief systems are equal, and that only "bigots" oppose one or another, or dare to examine how one may be contain incitements to violence and supremacism.

 

ISG: a study in the tolerance of gobal, ideologically guided terrorism.

Before the Dec 7th bombing of Pearl Harbor the U.S. was negotiating with Japan.  Is it significant that the ISG (Iraq Study Group) comes out with a tolerance of global, ideologically guided terrorism plan for Iraq the day before Dec. 7th..  They see the tip of the iceberg but Titanic-like they proceed with a plan which will lead to the continued degeneration of a fearful, materialistic, godless culture already filled with self loathing.   


We left Korea unfinished.


We left Viet Nam unfinished


We are disposed to let the terrorists do as they will because we are leaving, if ISG has its way, before finishing.


Got Berka?


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Powered by Qumana


December 6, 2006

Should America set a firm date to pull out of Iraq?

 

The Iraq Study Group set the end of 2008 as the date for the withdrawal of US combat forces in Iraq.  What’s your opinion on setting a date for a withdrawal from Iraq?  Tell your Member of Congress and President Bush what you think.

  • Yes, the US should set a firm date for withdrawal from Iraq, regardless of the security status in the country.

  • No, the US should allow events on the ground determine a withdrawal timetable.

Link to Congress.org  and vote.

David Belfort Wanted you to see this: Bring Both Holy Texts, Representative Ellison

David Belfort (david.belfort@gmail.com) wanted you to see this: Bring Both Holy Texts, Representative Ellison
-------------------------------------------------------------
Message from David Belfort:
Dennis Prager has the right idea. Same God.

Bring Both Holy Texts, Representative Ellison

http://www.townhall.com/TalkRadio/Show.aspx?RadioShowID=3&ContentGuid=50c480b8-d8e0-4b4d-adc0-6111fd3379bf

=============================================================
TownHall.Com
http://www.TownHall.com

December 4, 2006

From Slashfood Blog

 I liked this so much I put the whole story.  This is a good thing.  I hope there will be follow-up on reports of "passing on the good things". David

Starbucks' chain of cheer

Posted Nov 12th 2006 2:32PM by Nicole Weston
Filed under: Coffee, Business, Coffee shops

Have you been to Starbucks lately? If so, you have probably noticed that their signature holiday red cups are in use, but if you are lucky, you might have noticed something else was happening in the stores, too. Starbucks just launched their cheer-pass movement. The company's goal is to start a chain of cheer this season by passing on good things to some of their customers, in the hopes that they, in turn, will pass that good cheer on to someone else by doing something thoughtful for another person. To kick off the program, last week some Manhattan commuters were given free subway MetroCards and free movie tickets were given away in Chicago. Other bits of cheer from the company might include free samples of the chain's holiday beverages, bags of coffee and $5 Starbucks Cards.

The only "catch", such as it is, is that the cheer spread by the company is accompanied by cheer passes, which are numbered cards that you are supposed to pass on if and when you "pay it forward" and do something good for another person this season. They have the Starbucks logo, but the real purpose of the passes is to track the chain of good deeds. By entering the number of the card on the cheer pass website, you can enter your good deed and see what other ones were associated with that particular card before you received it.

The company hopes to distribute 10,000 pieces of cheer daily for the next eight weeks to see, in the holiday spirit, just how far one good deed can go.

Source: Slashfood

Let's have a pompous Christmas forgetting ourselves long enough to yearn for the King

I enjoy the contributions of Tolkien and C.S. Lewis.  Seeing yet more light  radiating from a  recently polished facet of their work gives me goose bumps and tingles. A friend of mine, William Lay, shared the following:



I am a huge fan of Tolkien, and I wanted to share some excerpts from a book that I found recently called:  “The Philosophy of Tolkien:  The Worldwide Behind The Lord of the Rings”, by Peter J. Kreeft.


Kreeftis professor of philosophy at Boston College.



“Take kingship.  Though we do not have kings in America, or want them, our unconscious mind both has them and wants them.  We all know what a true king is, a real king, an ideal king, an archetypal king.  He is not a mere politician or soldier.  Something in us longs to give him our loyalty and fealty and service and obedience.  He is lot but longed for and will some day return, like Arthur.  In The Lord of the Rings, Arthur’s name is ‘Aragorn’.  When we read The Lord of the Rings, he returns to his throne in our minds.  He was always there; The Lord of the Rings only brings him back into our consciousness from the tomb of the unconscious, where he was sleeping.”  (pp.44-45)


“The very fact that pompous is now used only in a bad sense measures the degree to which we have lost the old idea of ‘solemnity.’ . . . In an age when every one puts on his oldest clothes to be happy in, you must re-awake the simpler state of mind in which people put on gold and scarlet to be happy in.  Above all, you must be rid of the hideous idea, fruit of a widespread inferiority complex, that pomp, on the proper occasions, has any connection with vanity or self-conceit.  A celebrant approaching the altar, a princess led out by a king to dance a minuet, a general officer on a ceremonial parade, a major-domo preceding the boar’s head at a Christmas feast – all these wear unusual clothes and move with calculated dignity.  This does not mean that they are vain, but that they are obedient. . . .  The modern habit of doing ceremonial things unceremoniously is no proof of humility; rather it proves the offender’s inability to forget himself in the rite.”  (p. 149, quoting C.S. Lewis, A Preface to “Paradise Lost” at 17, 21)



Let's have a pompous Christmas forgetting ourselves long enough to yearn for the King among us.



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Powered by Qumana


Example of Religious persecution in Turkey?

Who are Hakan Tastan and Turan Topal?

By tmatt on Islam

CompassTurkeyDuring this busy week, I have been watching to see if two men’s names showed up, at any point, in Google News.

I mean showed up in mainstream news sites, not the sites that care about issues like religious liberty. Of course, once upon a time, we could assume that, as a rule, journalists tended to care quite a bit about issues like free speech and the rights of oppressed minority groups. Where is A.M. Rosenthal when you need him?

Anyway, the names are Hakan Tastan and Turan Topal (left to right in the photo).

You can find out why they are important by flashing back to an AsiaNews report from earlier this month.

But I have been watching to see if their names surfaced in coverage of Pope Benedict XVI’s visit to Turkey. Why? To answer that question we have to turn to some form of advocacy media — like this Compass Direct report by veteran journalist Barbara G. Baker (a friend of this blog), which was, thank goodness, picked up by Baptist Press.

To cut to the chase, these two men continue to be accused of “insulting Turkishness” because they have, as evangelicals, tried to do evangelical things. You know, the kinds of basic free-speech activities that people can do in countries that are part of the European Union. I think.

Formally the two Christians are charged with violating Article 301 of the Turkish penal code, under which scores of Turkish intellectuals and writers have been prosecuted in the past 18 months for allegedly denigrating “Turkish identity.” The former Muslims also are accused under separate statutes of reviling Islam (Article 216), as well as secretly compiling files on private citizens for a Bible correspondence course without the individuals’ knowledge or permission (Article 135).

“We don’t use force to tell anyone about Christianity,” Tastan said. “But we are Christians, and if the Lord permits, we will continue to proclaim this.”

Describing himself and Topal as “citizens of the Republic of Turkey who love its democratic, secular system,” Tastan emphasized that he and Topal had nothing to hide in defending themselves in court. “We are not ashamed to be Turks. We are not ashamed to be Christians.”

Now, what does this sound like from the other side of the issue, from the side of the rising tide of — depending on who is doing the labeling — the “ultranationalists” or in some cases “Islamists.” Are the Christian men anti-secularist or anti-Islam? Which label will get you jailed or killed quickest?

The attorney pushing to silence Tastan and Topal is Kemal Kerincsiz:

“Christian missionaries working almost like terrorist groups are able to enter into high schools and among primary school students,” Kerincsiz told reporters. “They deceive our children with beautiful young girls.”

At this, one Turkish Christian in the crowd shouted, “He’s lying!” Several nationalist demonstrators reacted violently, starting to shove the converts’ supporters and hitting one. But police promptly intervened to detain and remove the attacker, releasing him a few minutes later.

The Christian who had been struck also was detained briefly by the authorities, who questioned him and then photocopied his identity card before releasing him.

. . . By this time, a group of local nationalists had unfurled a banner in front of the cameras reading, “Missionaries: Keep your hands off our schools and children.”

There’s a lot more to read. Here is my question: Why isn’t this mainstream news if the back story to the papal visit is Turkey’s bid to enter the European Union and, well, the Western world built on some form of rule of law? I am glad that “Christian news agencies” cover these stories, believe me. I respect the work they do. But why do I need to read about this religious-liberty issue on “religious” news sites?

I want to read about this in the elite MSM newspapers and wire services. It’s news.

Right? Does religious liberty matter? Does free speech matter? How about the freedom of assembly? And isn’t this linked, in a way, with the freedom of the press?

Photo from Compass Direct NewsTrackback to : Get Religion Blog

 

December 3, 2006

Spirited Dialogue Kit | citizenJoe

 A possible venue for HDH activities in your neighborhood.

Spirited Dialogue Kit

Step I—Get a Buddy, or Two

Step II—Find a Venue

Step III— Choose a Topic

Step IV—Getting a presenter or two?

Step V—Inviting the World

Step VI—reading materials

Step VII— hosting the event!

Sample invite

Sample readings, fact sheets and chartsy stuff

Intro

We started Spirited Dialogues in NYC with a few simple ideas: bring together folks with different viewpoints in an casual spot, toss out a topic, maybe prep guests with materials or a presenter, and open up the discussion using a couple of rules: “be nice” and “try not to talk more than a minute.”

It worked like a charm.

Getting a Spirited Dialogue started in your hood won’t take much—an interest in open dialogue is all that’s needed.

This Spirited Dialogue “tool kit” shows you how easy it is. If you’re already a natural organizer or host/hostess, we’re probably not going to tell you anything new. If your inner organizer is just beginning to bust out, however, we have a tip or two to steer you in the right direction.

Also included in the SD kit:

Sample readings and fact sheets (from past and future SDs)

Source: Spirited Dialogue Kit | citizenJoe